User talk:Flamsmark: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


I see that you undid all my edits here [https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Membership&diff=next&oldid=35778] without any comments. Can you say why you rolled them all back? I'm pretty sure that all of my changes are in-keeping with the ongoing consensus discussion. I'm happy to discuss each potential change. --[[User:Gadlen|gadlen]] ([[User talk:Gadlen|talk]]) 03:19, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
I see that you undid all my edits here [https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Membership&diff=next&oldid=35778] without any comments. Can you say why you rolled them all back? I'm pretty sure that all of my changes are in-keeping with the ongoing consensus discussion. I'm happy to discuss each potential change. --[[User:Gadlen|gadlen]] ([[User talk:Gadlen|talk]]) 03:19, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Update: I see in this edit [https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Category:Associate_Members&diff=prev&oldid=35782] you commented "You need to add the tag". It doesn't seem correct that adding a tag to a page makes you an associate member. However, being an associate member does let you legitimately add the tag. --[[User:Gadlen|gadlen]] ([[User talk:Gadlen|talk]]) 03:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:32, 14 November 2013

uncommented Membership page rollback

I see that you undid all my edits here [1] without any comments. Can you say why you rolled them all back? I'm pretty sure that all of my changes are in-keeping with the ongoing consensus discussion. I'm happy to discuss each potential change. --gadlen (talk) 03:19, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Update: I see in this edit [2] you commented "You need to add the tag". It doesn't seem correct that adding a tag to a page makes you an associate member. However, being an associate member does let you legitimately add the tag. --gadlen (talk) 03:32, 15 November 2013 (UTC)