Talk:Getting In

From Noisebridge
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Redundant edits?: new section)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Redundant edits? ==
 
== Redundant edits? ==
  
Each of the edits [https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Getting_In&diff=0&oldid=34988 here] seem bit redundant. For example, does it need to say both "friend" and "known acquiantance"? If this is trying to be a guide, I believe the language should be as clean as possible; perfect "clarity" should be left for some legalese-like page that might be linked to.
+
Each of the edits [https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Getting_In&diff=34989&oldid=34988 here] seem bit redundant. For example, does it need to say both "friend" and "known acquiantance"? If this is trying to be a guide, I believe the language should be as clean as possible; perfect "clarity" should be left for some legalese-like page that might be linked to.
  
 
What do you think? --[[User:Gadlen|gadlen]] ([[User talk:Gadlen|talk]]) 17:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 
What do you think? --[[User:Gadlen|gadlen]] ([[User talk:Gadlen|talk]]) 17:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:10, 4 November 2013

Redundant edits?

Each of the edits here seem bit redundant. For example, does it need to say both "friend" and "known acquiantance"? If this is trying to be a guide, I believe the language should be as clean as possible; perfect "clarity" should be left for some legalese-like page that might be linked to.

What do you think? --gadlen (talk) 17:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Personal tools