Talk:Getting In: Difference between revisions
(→Redundant edits?: new section) |
(→Word replacement: new section) |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Circuit.jpg]] | |||
== Redundant edits? == | == Redundant edits? == | ||
Each of the edits [https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Getting_In&diff= | Each of the edits [https://noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Getting_In&diff=34989&oldid=34988 here] seem bit redundant. For example, does it need to say both "friend" and "known acquiantance"? If this is trying to be a guide, I believe the language should be as clean as possible; perfect "clarity" should be left for some legalese-like page that might be linked to. | ||
What do you think? --[[User:Gadlen|gadlen]] ([[User talk:Gadlen|talk]]) 17:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | What do you think? --[[User:Gadlen|gadlen]] ([[User talk:Gadlen|talk]]) 17:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Vouchsafe == | |||
I removed the term [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vouchsafe vouchsafed] as in "properly vouchsafed guest". I could be wrong but it seems like an esoteric term that doesn't actually convey the meaning of what is going on here. Merriam-Webster says it's "to grant or furnish often in a gracious or condescending manner" | |||
I feel that [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vouched vouched for] is more clear, modern and conveys the intention better. "to give a guarantee : become surety" What do you think? --[[User:Gadlen|gadlen]] ([[User talk:Gadlen|talk]]) 17:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Extra space == | |||
There is an extra space in "[[Do-ocracy]] -style," which should be removed. [[User:Frank|Frank]] ([[User talk:Frank|talk]]) 17:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Request for edit == | |||
This page seems to be protected. I think it would be best to have a prominent link to [[Getting Here]] at the top of the page, as it's easy to end up on this page when you're looking for directions. -[[User:Peteforsyth|Pete F]] ([[User talk:Peteforsyth|talk]]) 19:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Word replacement == | |||
"Good times to catch us our in the evenings during the week" should read "Good times to catch us are in the evenings during the week" |
Latest revision as of 03:45, 2 November 2018
Redundant edits?[edit]
Each of the edits here seem bit redundant. For example, does it need to say both "friend" and "known acquiantance"? If this is trying to be a guide, I believe the language should be as clean as possible; perfect "clarity" should be left for some legalese-like page that might be linked to.
What do you think? --gadlen (talk) 17:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Vouchsafe[edit]
I removed the term vouchsafed as in "properly vouchsafed guest". I could be wrong but it seems like an esoteric term that doesn't actually convey the meaning of what is going on here. Merriam-Webster says it's "to grant or furnish often in a gracious or condescending manner"
I feel that vouched for is more clear, modern and conveys the intention better. "to give a guarantee : become surety" What do you think? --gadlen (talk) 17:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
Extra space[edit]
There is an extra space in "Do-ocracy -style," which should be removed. Frank (talk) 17:51, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Request for edit[edit]
This page seems to be protected. I think it would be best to have a prominent link to Getting Here at the top of the page, as it's easy to end up on this page when you're looking for directions. -Pete F (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
Word replacement[edit]
"Good times to catch us our in the evenings during the week" should read "Good times to catch us are in the evenings during the week"