Editing Policy Wonks

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 16: Line 16:


== Next Meeting ==
== Next Meeting ==
March 5 2012, 1930h; Noisebridge, Turing Meeting Room
16 Feb 2012, 1730h
Location: Noisebridge, Turing Meeting Room


Attendees:
Attendees:
Line 25: Line 26:
* Agree who is going to edit the wiki pages.
* Agree who is going to edit the wiki pages.
* Copy this agenda to the [https://pad.riseup.net/p/0OyA0MRFYKtS etherpad] for group contribution.
* Copy this agenda to the [https://pad.riseup.net/p/0OyA0MRFYKtS etherpad] for group contribution.
* Agree on our next meeting time/place, post to the [Noisebridge#Upcoming_Events front page] and NB calendar, and invite policy@lists.
* Agree on our next meeting time/place, post to the [Noisebridge#Upcoming_Events front page] and NB calendar, and invite policy@lists.
* Note the attendees of this meeting.
* Note the attendees of this meeting.
* Note any items of agreement.
* Note any items of agreement.
Line 31: Line 32:


Agenda:
Agenda:
* Review proposed philosophies
* Kelly reports on CA public benefit law
* Tom reports on minimization of the bylaws
** Tom: proposal for ongoing Bylaws WG and system to maintain & update the bylaws
* Discuss modifications to the by-laws
* Discussion item: rulers versus rules. Is it un-Noisebridge to use community-agreed provisions to protect ourselves from bad behavior?
* Potential consensus item: empower NB's denizens to do-ocratically kick people out, pending mediation.
* Potential consensus proposal: it is not excellent to admit someone to Noisebridge unless you are willing to take responsibility for their actions here
** Could be NB's consensus, could not: either way, may stoke thought about this during the meeting rather than in the nb-discuss echo-chamber
* Potential consensus proposal: Noisebridge is a place for hacking


To-do:
To-do:
* Kelly: describe harm-minimization bylaws
*Kelly
* Snail: describe hands-off bylaws
**Research '''California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law'''
* Tom: describe utopian by-laws
***http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/california/forming-nonprofit-corporation-california
***http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/bylaws-nonprofit-corporations
***http://managementhelp.org/boards/index.htm#anchor314119
*Tom
**Rewrite bylaws into a skeleton format identifying issues that need to be fixed


= Not a Manifesto =
= Not a Manifesto =
Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see Noisebridge:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)