Editing
Policy/Past Meetings
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==16 Feb 2012== 16 Feb 2012, 1730h Location: Noisebridge, Turing Meeting Room Attendees: [[User:flamsmark|Tom]], [[User:Snail|Snail]], Mitch, Kelly, [[User:SuperQ|SuperQ]], [[User:Leif|Leif]], Martin, Ron, David Schneider-Joseph, David Estes, Lots of people This meeting was derailed into a social engineering hybrid meeting with Mitch ([https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2012-February/028457.html see noisebridge discuss]). The [[Keycode Access]] system was also discussed extensively. None of the agenda items were covered. Administriva: * Agree who is going to edit the wiki pages. * Copy this agenda to the [https://pad.riseup.net/p/0OyA0MRFYKtS etherpad] for group contribution. * Agree on our next meeting time/place, post to the [Noisebridge#Upcoming_Events front page] and NB calendar, and invite policy@lists. * Note the attendees of this meeting. * Note any items of agreement. * Add any proposed consensus items to next week's meeting notes. Agenda: * Kelly reports on CA public benefit law * Tom reports on minimization of the bylaws ** Tom: proposal for ongoing Bylaws WG and system to maintain & update the bylaws * Discuss modifications to the by-laws * Discussion item: rulers versus rules. Is it un-Noisebridge to use community-agreed provisions to protect ourselves from bad behavior? * Potential consensus item: empower NB's denizens to do-ocratically kick people out, pending mediation. * Potential consensus proposal: it is not excellent to admit someone to Noisebridge unless you are willing to take responsibility for their actions here ** Could be NB's consensus, could not: either way, may stoke thought about this during the meeting rather than in the nb-discuss echo-chamber * Potential consensus proposal: Noisebridge is a place for hacking To-do: *Kelly **Research '''California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law''' ***http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/california/forming-nonprofit-corporation-california ***http://www.citmedialaw.org/legal-guide/bylaws-nonprofit-corporations ***http://managementhelp.org/boards/index.htm#anchor314119 *Tom **Rewrite bylaws into a skeleton format identifying issues that need to be fixed
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see
Noisebridge:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Request account
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Dig in!
Noisebridge
- Status: MOVED
- Donate
- ABOUT
- Accessibility
- Vision
- Blog
Manual
MANUAL
Visitors
Participation
Community Standards
Channels
Operations
Events
EVENTS
Guilds
GUILDS
- Meta
- Electronics
- Fabrication
- Games
- Music
- Library
- Neuro
- Philosophy
- Funding
- Art
- Crypto
- Documentation/Wiki
Wiki
Recent Changes
Random Page
Help
Categories
(Edit)
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information