Noisebridge: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
--Language regarding identity <br> | --Language regarding identity <br> | ||
--What information will be shared? <br> | --What information will be shared? <br> | ||
[ | [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/issues/19 Pull Request] | ||
=== Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages === | === Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages === | ||
--Pattern of abuse of the consensus process <br> | --Pattern of abuse of the consensus process <br> | ||
--Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom <br> | --Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom <br> | ||
--Rewriting consensus history: [ | --Rewriting consensus history: [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26 N0_Hat ] <br> | ||
--Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement <br> | --Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement <br> | ||
--James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation. <br> | --James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation. <br> | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
=== Revert banning of N0_Hat === | === Revert banning of N0_Hat === | ||
[ | [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/26 Pull Request ] | ||
==== Consensus ==== | ==== Consensus ==== | ||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
What's up with the community working group? | What's up with the community working group? | ||
In it's idea format [ | In it's idea format [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/22 Pull request] | ||
Let's just do it too. | Let's just do it too. | ||
Adhoc discussions happing in the meat space | Adhoc discussions happing in the meat space |
Revision as of 22:27, 1 April 2014
Membership Binder
- Hephestus
- Kate K
- Qbit
Financial Report
- Funds in bank: $29,281
- Noisetor (See the bulletpoints at the bottom of http://noisetor.net/finances/#summary):
Consensus items
Proposals from last week
(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the Consensus Items History page.)
House Rules/Community Agreements/Fair Use
Needs greater summary
Semi-publish Member List
Sent back for rewording for clarity
--Language regarding identity
--What information will be shared?
Pull Request
Revoke Tom's Council Member Privilages
--Pattern of abuse of the consensus process
--Blocking Link's consensus proposal to revoke Tom's Mailmain privs/ban Tom
--Rewriting consensus history: N0_Hat
--Deleting Wiki endorsements and not responding to the disenfranchised members concern regarding their deleted endorsement
--James blocked publishing the member list via email to Tom. James could not publish to discuss (it was under moderation) and James emailed Tom to block publishing the member list before the meeting. Consensus was reached at the meeting, absent Jame's participation.
Consensus was blocked in favor of continuing this discussion when Tom is able to be present.
Revert banning of N0_Hat
Consensus
Proposals for next week
(Add any new items for consensus to the Current Consensus Items page.)
Discussion Notes
Brainstorming on improved forums for discussion
Like to have specific thread for specific proposals Riseup Collective and group in New Zeland have software to facilitate decision making We can write our own software too Tech that does things in the way that we're accustomed to doing them already Splitting mailing lists does not imporve signal-to-noise Improve quality of Noisebridge-Discuss Remove certain bad actors occassionally New contributors are moderated Consumers of messages can filter - we have the tools - mls baysian spam filter Could have moderated and unmoderated list
What's up with the community working group?
In it's idea format Pull request Let's just do it too. Adhoc discussions happing in the meat space AI for online dispute resolution environment Mining mailing list for 'ask to leave heuristic'
Systemic problem with disenfranchisement
The way we do things needs to change More time, more advantage Find a solution where everyone can participate
Process hack-a-thon
Rainbow Grocery offers professional mediation training for non-profits
Attendance
- Ron
- Gregg
- JC
- Kevin
- Jon
- Dale
- Brandon
- Christopher
- Steve
- Jarod
- Dana
- Norman
- Xaviar
- Monad
- Bill
- Carlos
- Casey
- Daravinne
Now that the meeting is over, don't forget to post the meeting notes to the wiki and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.