Meeting Notes 2014 06 03

You should read the meeting instructions forthwith!
Don't forget to post the meeting notes to the wiki and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.

These are the notes from the The 316th Meeting of Noisebridge. Note-taker: Kevin ; Moderator: Jarrod

• Consensed github repository as true source of consensus history
• 3 Member apps were proxy blocked and tabled for further discussion offline
• Refactoring Noisebridge access policy was discussed

Short announcements and events

• Firmware needs upgrading
• Want to have a Noisebridge caravan to Toorcamp, contact Kevin <bfb at riseup dot net>
• Matt wants to talk shop on Android
• Joe wants to teach silk screening at Noisebridge.

Membership Binder

• John E w4 - elects to wait until next week
• John S w3
• Sven w1
• Alan w2

Cory w4 consensus discussion

I enjoy the openness of Noisebridge. Spend a good bit of time here. Want to put my money where my mouth is. I bring conflict mediation skills and prior experience in the non-profit world.
What's a hackerspace? This
How can we improve Noisebridge? Throw my hat in for Secretary.
When do you see yourself blocking? I would sooner walk away than block.
Who sent you? Who are you working for? I have my motivations. I want to learn Unix and such.
Do you think it is fair to say that as a general guideline that banning due to personality clashes is appropriate? No.
Monad proxy blocks. Will discuss in person or private with Cory further.

Deja w4 consensus discussion

Monad proxy blocks. Will discuss in person or private with Deja further.

Sid w4 consensus discussion

Monad proxy blocks. Will discuss in person or private with Sid further.

Financial Report

• Funds in bank: Unknown
• Noisetor (See the bulletpoints at the bottom of http://noisetor.net/finances/#summary):

Consensus items

Proposals from last week

(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the Consensus Items History page.)

Affirm repository as accurate Noisebridge consensus

After minor edits to the pull request, consensus was reached.

Access policy Week 1

Noisebridge should be as open as possible.

I like the simple wording.
More accurately reflects reality.
Language could use some more umph. Perhaps a stronger statement of values...
Suggested change "Noisebridge is open, when it is not closed"
Excellence remains over arching norm.
Author is open to updating the language, more discussion, a working group, invites anybody to modify the wiki.

Proposals for next week

(Add any new items for consensus to the Current Consensus Items page.)

Attendance

• Alan
• Jarrod -Moderator
• Sid
• Jade
• J
• Matt
• Dan
• Cory
• Daravinne
• Kevin
• Casey
• Alma
• Mike
• John
• Amanda
• Chuck
• Joe
• Eve

Now that the meeting is over, don't forget to post the meeting notes to the wiki and e-mail the discussion list with a short summary.