Editing
Meeting Notes 2014 05 27
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== [[ Consensus Items History | Proposals from last week ]] == '''Naomi''': Consensus item was passed that you must tag yourself as a Member on the wiki. Shifts responsibilities of secretary onto individuals who by consequence have to display publicly that they are Noisebridge members, which is antithetical to ideals of people who founded the space. They are unhappy about it. Furthermore, 20 or so people did/would never do this and exerted civil disobedience about the rule. Follow edict of "don't give orders you don't expect people to follow" and do away with this policy item. We have a paper binder which fulfills legal requirement of having a member list without making it public to the world. ''[Point of info: the paper binder doesn't contain the current list of Members. Only the Secretary and a private GitHub repo contain that information. --[[User:Nthmost|Nthmost]] ([[User talk:Nthmost|talk]]) 21:04, 29 May 2014 (UTC)]'' '''John Ellis''': Detail about consensus item: don't have to use legal/wallet name. But some just don't like to use the wiki. There are some who are known by a name other than their legal ones, e.g. Mr. X. Also forgetting: what's the requirement to remain a member in good standing? Since last week, you have to pay dues. '''Deja''': Agree with Jarrod - can't identify who is a member by using the binder, can't tell who is banned - have no faces to the names. Might suggest that we take a picture of each member to put a face to the name. '''John Ellis''': Objection that if someone is sitting and hacking and hasn't been sponsored, it's a stupid technicality that they can be asked to leave despite their status. '''Jarrod''': It isn't the case about the binder. Secretary needs to make list of Members available to Members, but it doesn't have to be published. '''Mike''': Open-source route, keep Markdown file and allow pull requests. '''Naomi''': We have the list. Wiki tokens aren't working out for who is/isn't member. Only point of Membership is responsibility of consensus. '''Matt''': It's not a matter of membership/associate/guest, your actions dictate excellence or not. Regardless of who you are, if you're asked to leave, it should be taken seriously. '''Dan''': Anticipating some situation where we'd want to have a member authenticate as such, but not something that should ever come up in the space, if someone's asked to leave, I should not have to see if they're a member of the board. An appropriate alternative to photographs would be a GPG key. Culturally, though, it should not matter what their on-paper status is. '''Kevin''': No concerns with current consensus item? '''John Shutt''': Any concerns about current proposal? '''John Ellis''': Before special events like an election, we should have a list of eligible voters just to check whether someone's on the list (is a member in good standing). '''Naomi''': I'll email everyone who's a member. '''Matt''': Last night, a person was in here who someone suspected of already having been banned. A regular was able to confirm that she was banned, and when she brought up that she was a guest of someone, that person was banned too. '''Naomi''': There are only two members here; do we want to defer or ask the list? '''Deja''': We know the process, people who are not here, that's too bad. '''John Shutt''': Do you know of any Members who would have an objection to this? '''Jeffrey/Naomi''': Nope '''Jeffrey''': I don't think it's necessary to do anything more than what we're already doing. '''John Ellis''': Most meetings have had less than 4 Members present at the meeting. '''Daniela''': Listen to what you feel. '''Naomi''': I'll mention to the list that we're passing consensus, we can pass even further consensus if anyone wants to change it back. '''Monad''': No objection. '''John Shutt''': Consensus passed.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see
Noisebridge:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Request account
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Dig in!
Noisebridge
- Status: MOVED
- Donate
- ABOUT
- Accessibility
- Vision
- Blog
Manual
MANUAL
Visitors
Participation
Community Standards
Channels
Operations
Events
EVENTS
Guilds
GUILDS
- Meta
- Electronics
- Fabrication
- Games
- Music
- Library
- Neuro
- Philosophy
- Funding
- Art
- Crypto
- Documentation/Wiki
Wiki
Recent Changes
Random Page
Help
Categories
(Edit)
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information