Editing Meeting Notes 2014 01 14

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 78: Line 78:


=== Audio Stream Meetings ===
=== Audio Stream Meetings ===
TEXT:
TEXT:
That the Tuesday Meeting be streamed in audio when possible, with the  aim of encouraging online involvement. By the consensus of those  present, the meeting may be limited to those in the space for privacy  reasons. The responsibility for streaming will be that of the secretary.
That the Tuesday Meeting be streamed in audio when possible, with the  aim of encouraging online involvement. By the consensus of those  present, the meeting may be limited to those in the space for privacy  reasons. The responsibility for streaming will be that of the secretary.
Privacy concern, will preclude some from participating
Privacy concern, will preclude some from participating
> let's make it easier for the people that we like to participate
> let's make it easier for the people that we like to participate
> audio only, streamed and not persisted
> audio only, streamed and not persisted
Should be at space to participate in meeting
Should be at space to participate in meeting
> Some people cannot, EX sick, too many KMs away,  
> Some people cannot, EX sick, too many KMs away,  
How will thoes tuning in participate? IRC, troll-proof conference call?
How will thoes tuning in participate? IRC, troll-proof conference call?
Could try this without consensus
Could try this without consensus
> More likely to happen if consensed
> More likely to happen if consensed
More people, more noise
More people, more noise
> Have seen this run well in the past with 200+ people consensus decision
> Have seen this run well in the past with 200+ people consensus decision
> Zakim a good solution? http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
> Zakim a good solution? http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html
secretary@noisebridge.net collecting donations to purchase a phone to make the conference call
secretary@noisebridge.net collecting donations to purchase a phone to make the conference call
==== Consensed with 3 stainding aside ====
==== Consensed with 3 stainding aside ====
''(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the [[Consensus Items History]] page.)''
''(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the [[Consensus Items History]] page.)''
== [[ Current Consensus Items | Proposals for next week ]] ==
== [[ Current Consensus Items | Proposals for next week ]] ==
''(Add any new items for consensus to the [[Current Consensus Items]] page.)''
''(Add any new items for consensus to the [[Current Consensus Items]] page.)''
Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see Noisebridge:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)