Editing Meeting Notes 2013 01 22

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 77: Line 77:
== [[ Consensus Items History | Proposals from last week ]] ==
== [[ Consensus Items History | Proposals from last week ]] ==
''(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the [[Consensus Items History]] page.)''
''(Add any items which pass or are blocked to the [[Consensus Items History]] page.)''
* John Withers: DreamWorks wants to use our logo in a movie they're making about Julian Assange (Miloh: Hackers II!). There is no consensus to be had; two people said they would block. One was extremely rigid in her position and would never not block.
** Leif: We need consensus approval on the script!
** Snail: We should use the Nosebridge logo!
** Danny: It stars Benedict Cumberwhatsit
** Kim: HOLY SHIT! SAY YES! He's gonna have it all over his face!!
*** Oh wait. He's really ugly right there.
*** Danny: Yes, that's why it will suck. He's not pretty.
** Danny: Seems like they should legally be allowed to use it (nominative fair use). Want to write them a letter telling them it's legal for them to use it without asking, but relies on them relying on principles that we stand against. ** Tell them to feel free to donate to prevent Noisebridge from suing.
** Leif: consense on this next week
** Danny: will work with EFF to get the wording right for a snarktastic letter to DreamWorks explaining nominative fair use
** Snail: Let's ask for a DRM-free copy of the movie.
* Scud and Chrissie must leave, and must not return, except to attend a meeting on this topic until they engage in mediation and resolve concerns about their behavior.
** Miloh: Seems like some newer humans might have trouble with this; just know that this isn't absolute – they are welcome to come to meetings and engage in mediation.
** Leif: Yeah, that's it. This is the third time we've had a consensus item to bar people from NB, with less cause and fewer attempts at mediation. Don't want us to become too comfortable with doing this. This is partly because they've been sleeping here.
** Rayc: During their time here, numerous people asked them about sleeping here / fighting / drinking / drugs / disruption. They came back to pick up stuff, then left.
** Danny: Then maybe we don't need to do this?
** Rob: I told them already that they probably shouldn't be back unless they came to a meeting. (General agreement that this was the right thing to do.)
** Miloh/Danny: Put it as a discussion item for next week.
** Snail: Often, the mere suggestion of consensus to bar people is enough to make them leave. That seems to have happened.
** Justin: I'd drop it – think it leaves a bad taste in the mouth of new NB'ers.
** Danny: Okay, let's take it off.
Light banter: Miloh has Bitcoin Magazines for new members! Hooray!


== [[ Current Consensus Items | Proposals for next week ]] ==
== [[ Current Consensus Items | Proposals for next week ]] ==
Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see Noisebridge:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)