Editing
Meeting Notes 2012 02 21
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Consensus items == *None this week. === Proposals from last week === *None this week. === Proposals for next week === * Noisebridge is a place for hackers, hacking, and learning to hack. * It is not excellent to admit someone to Noisebridge unless you are willing to take responsibility for their actions here. * It is excellent to do-ocratically remove someone who is being un-excellent from the space, pending mediation. * If you are removed from the space for being un-excellent, it is not excellent to return until you have done mediation. **Tom proposed this one. After a discussion of issues, these things were in agreement, and these things represent how the community feels about noisebridge. Wants to raise them to see if they are the Consensus of Noisebridge. **Kelly agrees with all four of those statements but thinks none of them should go to consensus and will block all of them. She says it is excessive codification. **Jesse provides context: person hanging around was picking apart how Noisebridge doesn't codify this is a hackerspace, so he can do whatever he wants. Jesse brought it up last week and got feedback from community that this person was wrong. **Peter: define hacking. Has used this space to teach and learn skills. Does that come under hacking? ***Kelly: quick response. On our wiki is a vision page that describes hacking. **Description on front page of wiki is not an official consensus, but is in practise. **Kelly & Tom don't disagree on the substance of the statements but on whether or not to Consense on the statements. **miloh is anti-cruft. **Rayc suggests them as recommendations. **Some would like to outline recommendations on the wiki but nothing officially consensed. **Value to consenting as a group: reduced level of confusion. **Btw, this is not result of policywonks discussion. Policywonks is completely unaffiliated. **People are already following these standards and may not need these consensed to continue their behavior. **What is a hacker: Hacker Manifesto and ____. **Rachel: Not everything we consense on becomes a rule. Not all consensus items are rules, sometimes just one-time statements we make. Something like this would be providing clarity to people. **We are skirting the dead-end discussion of WHAT IS HACKING? **We can do-ocratically add these things to the wiki without making a Consensus. **Community Standards. **We've reached lower-case c consensus. **We probably can't reword these items to pass Consensus.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see
Noisebridge:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Log in
Request account
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Dig in!
Noisebridge
- Status: MOVED
- Donate
- ABOUT
- Accessibility
- Vision
- Blog
Manual
MANUAL
Visitors
Participation
Community Standards
Channels
Operations
Events
EVENTS
Guilds
GUILDS
- Meta
- Electronics
- Fabrication
- Games
- Music
- Library
- Neuro
- Philosophy
- Funding
- Art
- Crypto
- Documentation/Wiki
Wiki
Recent Changes
Random Page
Help
Categories
(Edit)
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information