Editing Meeting Notes 2012 01 17

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 37: Line 37:


mct  
mct  
Leif


Michel
Michel
Line 56: Line 54:
Robert Rayc
Robert Rayc


Elijah -- works with noiserep
Elijah -- works with noiserap


Andrew
Andrew
Line 63: Line 61:


Snail
Snail


=== Short Announcements ===
=== Short Announcements ===


Elijah -- this is Noiserep, new location! Two new machines
Elijah -- this is Noiserap, new location! Two new machines
under construction, two more to come. Wednesday 6PM to
under construction, two more to come. Wednesday 6PM to
whenever!
whenever!
Line 84: Line 83:


SuperQ is working some more on the lights. If you have questions mail build@lists.noisebridge.net
SuperQ is working some more on the lights. If you have questions mail build@lists.noisebridge.net


=== New or Stale Events ===
=== New or Stale Events ===
Line 111: Line 111:


CONSENSED!
CONSENSED!
Proposed consensus items:
Noisebridge should use the approval voting process for Board elections.
In the case of a tie between Noisebridge board candidates,
we have a lottery among the tied persons.


=== Discussion Items ===
=== Discussion Items ===


*drama* Elijah vouches for Robert. Moderation breaks. A discussion forms on the sidelines and the meeting continues.
*drama* Elijah vouches for Robert. Moderation breaks. A discussion forms on the sidelines and he meeting continues.


* [https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2012-January/027419.html Using approval voting for the Board election] (Proposed Leif)
* [https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2012-January/027419.html Using approval voting for the Board election] (Proposed Leif)
**Proposed language for two consensus items next week:
***Noisebridge should use the approval voting process for Board elections.
***In the case of a tie between Noisebridge board candidates, we have a lottery among the tied persons.
* Discuss adopting the [[Policy Wonks]]' [https://www.noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Talk:Membership&oldid=22673#Leaving_Noisebridge suggestion for membership expiry], for consensus next week.
* Discuss adopting the [[Policy Wonks]]' [https://www.noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Talk:Membership&oldid=22673#Leaving_Noisebridge suggestion for membership expiry], for consensus next week.
* Discuss adopting the [[Policy Wonks]]' [https://www.noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Talk:Membership&oldid=22673#Hiatus suggestion for members going on hiatus], for consensus next week.
* Discuss adopting the [[Policy Wonks]]' [https://www.noisebridge.net/index.php?title=Talk:Membership&oldid=22673#Hiatus suggestion for members going on hiatus], for consensus next week.
Please note that all contributions to Noisebridge are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see Noisebridge:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following CAPTCHA:

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)