Editing DreamworksReply

::: ''update: The letter below was sent in January 2013. 6 months later, a trailer for the film in question was released with the Noisebridge&trade; logo briefly visible at [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT1wb8_tcYU#t=0m43s 0:43].''

Dear Ashley and Todd,

Thanks for your letter asking for permission to use the Noisebridge logo on
sticker and T-shirts in the forthcoming DreamWorks movie about Julian Assange
and Daniel Domscheit-Berg. It must be very exciting to work on such a large
project, especially when you need, as your letter says, clearance on our logo
"tomorrow" (15th January). How annoying it must be to constantly ask for
such permissions, just for a little bit of set dressing!

It is probably long past the point when you needed it, but
here is our decision:

From your description, it should be clear to anyone watching your
film that you're just using the image to talk ''about'' Noisebridge, not claim
you ''are'' Noisebridge or that Noisebridge supports your film*. 

Given this, Noisebridge as a community believes you you have the free speech right to use such imagery without having to ask permission -- especially those who you might
be implicitly criticising or commenting upon. Such a right is encoded in the
existing nature of trademark and copyright with the idea of fair use. 

Sadly, knowledge of such rights have been eroded over the years by the
repeated claims of copyright maximalists, who would have you believe that you must beg
to refer to us in your film -- or even that you would be beholden to us if,
for instance, you parodied our disrespectful attitude to your concerns with the
following image, which includes both of our identifying marks, the
Noisebridge(TM) circuit, and the Unicorn Pissing A Rainbow(TM).

[[Image:Nb-dream-pee.jpg]]

Such a position is lunacy and a genuine threat to free speech and the first
amendment. You should exercise all of your fair use rights freely and without
fear. 

So we say tell your friends at DreamWorks to publish (or print, or produce) and
be damned. Tell them we fully support them in their brave stand. You can say
with confidence that the only conditions under which Noisebridge would sue them and their
partners to the maximum damages entitled to us by law would be if it turned out
that hackers like us were completely hypocritical nihilists out only for our
own egotistical ends. 

Given that you were so nice as to ask us, we can't imagine you think that of us.

Lots of love,

Noisebridge

* - which frankly sounds a bit sleazy. Are the screenwriters really inserting a fake subplot about a non-existent American spy in Iran who is exposed in the State department cables? Doesn't that seem a little irresponsible to you, given the great, real stories in the WikiLeaks affair you could have written about?



----



To Whom It May Concern,



I am a Clearance Coordinator working on the DreamWorks Studios feature
film The Fifth Estate and Production is interested in using the Noisebridge.net name and logo on stickers as set dressing and/or on
t-shirts as wardrobe.



I have attached a PDF containing a formal request letter, our standard
release form, and an image of the name/logo.  The letter explains what
the film is about, who is making it, and how Production intends to use
the name/logo.



If everything meets with your approval, please print the release form,
arrange for signature and return to us, preferably, via email to
XXXXX.  Should
you have any questions, concerns, or problems opening the attachment,
please contact me at your earliest convenience.



If permission is granted, Production would need to print the stickers
and/or t-shirt as soon as tomorrow to have them prepared for shooting.
I apologize for the urgency and understand that Production's schedule
is not your priority.  Your immediate attention to this request is
appreciated.



Thank you for your time and consideration.  We look forward to
receiving you response.



Sincerely,

Todd Kravitz

CLEARED BY ASHLEY, INC