Current Consensus Items

From Noisebridge
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(We should publish the members list. After all, it's not a secret.)
(Only members can join the council.)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
! Summary and pull request.
 
! Summary and pull request.
 
! Author of this Record
 
! Author of this Record
 
+
|-
 +
| 2014-02-15
 +
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 +
| Only members can join the council.
 +
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/4 Pull Request]. This also includes some clarifying re-structuring of the membership and council descriptions.
 +
| [[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
|-
 
|-
 
| 2014-02-15
 
| 2014-02-15

Revision as of 07:21, 12 February 2014

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Informal Title Summary and pull request. Author of this Record
2014-02-15 Tom Only members can join the council. Pull Request. This also includes some clarifying re-structuring of the membership and council descriptions. Tom
2014-02-15 Tom Publish member list in our policies git repo. Github issue Tom
2014-02-10 Greg Ask if notes are okay? The moderator of the weekly meeting should ask if people think that the prior weeks meeting notes are accurate and sufficient. (I invite amendments to the language - the purpose is to avoid confusion and shadow the procedure in formal meetings to approve the prior meetings minutes) Greg
2014-02-09 Robin Ban Pidgeon Pidgeon is unwelcome at Noisebridge. They are prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community. Robin
2014-01-21 (discussed? not in meeting notes) Tom Ban Lee Sonko Pull request Tom
2014-1-9 Dana Consensus process change 1. Consensus items at weekly meetings can be stopped from advancing by three member stand-asides or one block. Those objecting are encouraged to meet with proposal author(s) to develop mutually agreeable alternatives.

2. Membership meetings shall be scheduled and announced in advance. If a proposal cannot reach consensus or resolution at weekly meetings it may be added to a membership meeting agenda with sponsorship of three members. To take effect a proposal would require approval of 75% of members present physically or by proxy.

3. All current associate members shall be converted to full members, and the associate membership role abolished.

Dana
2014-1-8 Al In mediation Ban Dan Mediation complete. Mediators: Praveen, Madelynn.

Ban Dan from the space for a pattern of verbal abuse against Al.

Al
2013-12-10 Kevin Tabled until details are elaborated Expiration period for associate member policy Noisebridge should attach an expiration period of 90 days to the consensus decision to create new Member role. All subsequent mutations of the original consensus should be brought for a second consensus. If no consensus can be reached, Noisebridge will revert to being open to the public. Kevin
Personal tools