Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(update election items) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|2012-01-17 | |2012-01-17 | ||
|[[User:Leif|Leif]] | |[[User:Leif|Leif]] | ||
|[ | |Noisebridge should use the approval voting process for Board elections. | ||
|[[User:Leif|Leif]] | |||
|- | |||
|2012-01-17 | |||
|[[User:Leif|Leif]] | |||
|In the case of a tie between Noisebridge board candidates, we will have a lottery among the tied persons. | |||
|[[User:Leif|Leif]] | |[[User:Leif|Leif]] | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 02:19, 18 January 2012
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
| Date First Discussed | Proposed By | Wording | Author of this Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-01-03 | Tom | That the conditions under which Noisebridge membership expires be expressed more clearly and simply. | Danny |
| 2012-01-17 | Leif | Noisebridge should use the approval voting process for Board elections. | Leif |
| 2012-01-17 | Leif | In the case of a tie between Noisebridge board candidates, we will have a lottery among the tied persons. | Leif |