Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(Undo revision 51928 by FreeSpeech (talk))
(201 intermediate revisions by 48 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
The [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
The [[Consensus_Items_History|Consensus Items History]] is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.


{| border="1"
{| class="wikitable sortable" border="1"
! Date First Discussed  
! Date First Discussed  
! Proposed By
! Proposed By
! Wording
! Informal Title
! Summary and pull request.
! Author of this Record
! Author of this Record
|-
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_09_17|2013-09-17]]
| DATE || [[User:USER]] || Title || Proposal Text || [[User:USER]]
|Jake / Casey
|-  
|For a trial period of 3 months, Noisebridge shall be open, from 23:00 to 10:00, only to Members, guests of those Members present in the space, and those people with two Member endorsements in the membership binder. If one person who does not meet this criteria is required to leave under this rule, all people in the space not meeting this criteria should be required to leave. Every four weeks, there will be monthly check-in to the meeting, to collect feedback on this procedure.
|}
|[[user:hicksu|Jarrod]]
 
|-
Also see [[Onhold_consensus_items]] for proposals tabled until further notice.
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_10_15|2013-10-15]]
|Jake
|Membership to Noisebridge should no longer be dependant on a person's
ability or willingness to pay money to noisebridge, or to bring food or
beer to a meeting, but only on their ability to acquire sponsorship
signatures and be consensed upon at a meeting, after leaving the meeting
to give opportunity for any objections to be discussed before they return.
Members will thus enter and remain in good standing without regard to any
financial contributions they do or do not make in that time.
A Member can be suspended by consensus minus one, meaning that consensus
by the group can suspend indefinitely the membership of a person over that
person's objections.
|[[user:jake|jake]]
|-
<!--|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_07_23|2013-07-23]] - Deferred until process is defined.
|James
|Create a formal process for re-admitting people into the community. The exact process will be presented.
|[[user:hicksu|Jarrod]]-->
|-
<!-- |[[Meeting_Notes_2013_06_18|2013-06-18]] - Deferred 07/09/2013 to clarify wording
|Monad
|Some issues need to be fleshed out by a meeting of interested parties. They can identify the central points that require consensus during the weekly meeting.
|Casey -->

Revision as of 03:40, 3 May 2016

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Informal Title Summary and pull request. Author of this Record
DATE User:USER Title Proposal Text User:USER

Also see Onhold_consensus_items for proposals tabled until further notice.