Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
(132 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
! Date First Discussed  
! Date First Discussed  
! Proposed By
! Proposed By
! Wording
! Informal Title
! Summary and pull request.
! Author of this Record
! Author of this Record
|-
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_10_15|2013-10-15]]
| 2013-03-24
|Jake
| [[User:bfb|Kevin]]
|Membership to Noisebridge should no longer be dependant on a person's ability or willingness to pay money to noisebridge, or to bring food or beer to a meeting, but only on their ability to acquire sponsorship signatures and be consensed upon at a meeting, after leaving the meeting to give opportunity for any objections to be discussed before they return.
| Community Guidelines/Fair Usage Policy/House Rules
Members will thus enter and remain in good standing without regard to any financial contributions they do or do not make in that time.
| [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/25 Github issue [1]] [https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/27 Github issue [2]] [[https://github.com/noisebridge/bureaucracy/pull/9 House rules issue [3]]
A Member can be suspended by consensus minus one, meaning that consensus by the group can suspend indefinitely the membership of a person over that
| [[User:gregorydillon|Greg[1]]] [[User:bfb|Kevin[2]]] [[User:flamsmark|Tom[3]]]
person's objections.
|[[user:jake|jake]]
|-
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_10_15|2013-10-15]]
| 2013-03-24
|Jake
| [[User:bfb|Kevin]]
|JC Proposes that Noisebridge install Mag locks on the inner door
| Revoke Tom's council privileges
|[[user:hicksu|Jarrod]]
| Blocked until Tom is able to attend a Tuesday meeting. We discussed this on 2014.04.08 and resolved that it is reasonable to wait for Tom to attend a meeting to proceed with this, if Tom is not at the meeting, please skip this item.
| [[User:bfb|Kevin]]
|-
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_05|2013-11-05]]
|Justin
|I officially propose that any large policy changes at Noisebridge or in Noisebridge policies require at least 10 members or 50 percent of the members (whichever is smaller) to be present at the meeting that decides it.
|[[user:hicksu|Jarrod]]
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_05|2013-11-05]]
|Leif
|Revoke the previous two members-only consensus items are return Noisebridge to being a place where people are welcome to do excellent things without asking for permission from anyone.
|[[user:hicksu|Jarrod]]
|-
<!--|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_07_23|2013-07-23]]  - Deferred until process is defined.
|James
|Create a formal process for re-admitting people into the community. The exact process will be presented.
|[[user:hicksu|Jarrod]]-->
|-
<!-- |[[Meeting_Notes_2013_06_18|2013-06-18]] - Deferred 07/09/2013 to clarify wording
|Monad
|Some issues need to be fleshed out by a meeting of interested parties. They can identify the central points that require consensus during the weekly meeting.
|Casey -->

Revision as of 11:46, 11 April 2014

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Informal Title Summary and pull request. Author of this Record
2013-03-24 Kevin Community Guidelines/Fair Usage Policy/House Rules Github issue [1] Github issue [2] [House rules issue [3] Greg[1] Kevin[2] Tom[3]
2013-03-24 Kevin Revoke Tom's council privileges Blocked until Tom is able to attend a Tuesday meeting. We discussed this on 2014.04.08 and resolved that it is reasonable to wait for Tom to attend a meeting to proceed with this, if Tom is not at the meeting, please skip this item. Kevin