Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Jake's new associate membership proposal.)
(We had a meeting!)
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
! Author of this Record
! Author of this Record
|-
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_10_15|2013-10-15]]
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_12|2013-11-12]]
|Monad
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_12|Consenso]]
|Pigeon is unwelcome at Noisebridge. He is prohibited from entering the space or participating in the community.
|If a member has not identified themself as such by adding the Category:Members to their wiki user page by $DATE, they shall no longer be a member of Noisebridge.
|[[user:bfb|kevin]]
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
|-
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_10_22|2013-10-22]]
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_12|2013-11-12]]
|[[user:jake|Jake]]
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
|<blockquote>
|If a paper membership application has been in the binder for more than twelve weeks, that application should be discarded. If that person still wants to become a member, they must start the application process over from scratch.
A new Tier of Membership to Noisebridge shall exist, called Associate
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
Member.  People can become Associate Members through the normal
membership process.  Associate Members are not required to contribute to
Noisebridge financially, only to "contribute regularly" to Noisebridge.
Associate Members, while present, can host non-members in the space just
like Full Members.  But Associate Members cannot block consensus like
Members.
 
Also the policy of Noisebridge as a space open only to Members and their
guests shall be changed to 24 hours a day instead of 23:00 to 10:00.
This means that at any time, a person who is without a live sponsor in
the space can be told that if they cannot find a new live sponsor
promptly they should pack up and come back another time, perhaps Tuesday
night.
</blockquote>
|[[user:jake|jake]]
|-
<!--|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_07_23|2013-07-23]]  - Deferred until process is defined.
|James
|Create a formal process for re-admitting people into the community. The exact process will be presented.
|[[user:hicksu|Jarrod]]-->
|-
<!-- |[[Meeting_Notes_2013_06_18|2013-06-18]] - Deferred 07/09/2013 to clarify wording
|Monad
|Some issues need to be fleshed out by a meeting of interested parties. They can identify the central points that require consensus during the weekly meeting.
|Casey -->

Revision as of 23:19, 12 November 2013

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Wording Author of this Record
2013-11-12 Consenso If a member has not identified themself as such by adding the Category:Members to their wiki user page by $DATE, they shall no longer be a member of Noisebridge. Tom
2013-11-12 Tom If a paper membership application has been in the binder for more than twelve weeks, that application should be discarded. If that person still wants to become a member, they must start the application process over from scratch. Tom