Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(We had a meeting!)
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
! Author of this Record
! Author of this Record
|-
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_10_15|2013-10-15]]
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_12|2013-11-12]]
|Monad
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_12|Consenso]]
|To Exclude Pigeon from Noisebridge as per the normal wording.
|If a member has not identified themself as such by adding the Category:Members to their wiki user page by $DATE, they shall no longer be a member of Noisebridge.
|[[user:bfb|kevin]]
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
|-
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_10_15|2013-10-15]]
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_12|2013-11-12]]
|Jake
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
|Membership to Noisebridge should no longer be dependant on a person's ability or willingness to pay money to noisebridge, or to bring food or beer to a meeting, but only on their ability to acquire sponsorship signatures and be consensed upon at a meeting, after leaving the meeting to give opportunity for any objections to be discussed before they return.
|If a paper membership application has been in the binder for more than twelve weeks, that application should be discarded. If that person still wants to become a member, they must start the application process over from scratch.
Members will thus enter and remain in good standing without regard to any financial contributions they do or do not make in that time.
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
A Member can be suspended by consensus minus one, meaning that consensus by the group can suspend indefinitely the membership of a person over that
person's objections.
|[[user:jake|jake]]
|-
<!--|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_07_23|2013-07-23]]  - Deferred until process is defined.
|James
|Create a formal process for re-admitting people into the community. The exact process will be presented.
|[[user:hicksu|Jarrod]]-->
|-
<!-- |[[Meeting_Notes_2013_06_18|2013-06-18]] - Deferred 07/09/2013 to clarify wording
|Monad
|Some issues need to be fleshed out by a meeting of interested parties. They can identify the central points that require consensus during the weekly meeting.
|Casey -->

Revision as of 23:19, 12 November 2013

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Wording Author of this Record
2013-11-12 Consenso If a member has not identified themself as such by adding the Category:Members to their wiki user page by $DATE, they shall no longer be a member of Noisebridge. Tom
2013-11-12 Tom If a paper membership application has been in the binder for more than twelve weeks, that application should be discarded. If that person still wants to become a member, they must start the application process over from scratch. Tom