Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(We had a meeting!)
(44 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
! Author of this Record
! Author of this Record
|-
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_08_06|8/6]]
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_12|2013-11-12]]
|James
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_12|Consenso]]
|That James be reimbursed $__.__ for buying the dishrack for the kitchen, and Monad be reimbursed $__.__ for escorting 0.60 tons of trash from here to the rubbish dump.
|If a member has not identified themself as such by adding the Category:Members to their wiki user page by $DATE, they shall no longer be a member of Noisebridge.
|[[user:malaclyps|Danny]]
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
|-
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_07_23|7/23]]  
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_11_12|2013-11-12]]
|James
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
|Create a formal process for re-admitting people into the community. The exact process will be presented.
|If a paper membership application has been in the binder for more than twelve weeks, that application should be discarded. If that person still wants to become a member, they must start the application process over from scratch.
|[[user:hicksu|Jarrod]]
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
|-
|[[Meeting_Notes_2013_06_18|6/18]] - Deferred 07/09/2013 to clarify wording
|Monad
|Some issues need to be fleshed out by a meeting of interested parties. They can identify the central points that require consensus during the weekly meeting.
|Casey

Revision as of 23:19, 12 November 2013

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Wording Author of this Record
2013-11-12 Consenso If a member has not identified themself as such by adding the Category:Members to their wiki user page by $DATE, they shall no longer be a member of Noisebridge. Tom
2013-11-12 Tom If a paper membership application has been in the binder for more than twelve weeks, that application should be discarded. If that person still wants to become a member, they must start the application process over from scratch. Tom