Current Consensus Items: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
! Author of this Record | ! Author of this Record | ||
|- | |- | ||
| 2013 | | April 30 2013 | ||
| | | [[User:Reverend_Mik|Reverend Mik]] | ||
| | | that Noisebridge send Form CT-NRP-1 to the California Attorney General with a $20 check so that we as an organization are in compliance with California law, and require the treasurer to compile and submit the annual report to Attorney General's office as specified in the applicable case law. (original email with details here https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2013-April/036577.html ) | ||
| | | [[User:Reverend_Mik|Reverend Mik]] | ||
|- | |- | ||
} | |||
Revision as of 20:12, 25 April 2013
This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.
The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.
}| Date First Discussed | Proposed By | Wording | Author of this Record |
|---|---|---|---|
| April 30 2013 | Reverend Mik | that Noisebridge send Form CT-NRP-1 to the California Attorney General with a $20 check so that we as an organization are in compliance with California law, and require the treasurer to compile and submit the annual report to Attorney General's office as specified in the applicable case law. (original email with details here https://www.noisebridge.net/pipermail/noisebridge-discuss/2013-April/036577.html ) | Reverend Mik |