Current Consensus Items

From Noisebridge
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(remove passed items; update remaining item)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
|2012-01-03
 
|2012-01-03
 
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
 
|[[User:flamsmark|Tom]]
|That the conditions under which Noisebridge membership expires be expressed more clearly and simply.  
+
|That the conditions under which Noisebridge membership expires be expressed more clearly and simply. (3 of 4 items related to this passed; one is still pending)
 
|[[User:Malaclyps|Danny]]
 
|[[User:Malaclyps|Danny]]
|-
 
|2012-01-17
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
 
|Noisebridge should use the approval voting process for Board elections.
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
 
|-
 
|2012-01-17
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
 
|In the case of a tie between the election of Noisebridge board candidates, we will use a Roshimbo tournament between said parties to decide.
 
|[[User:Leif|Leif]]
 
  
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 12:17, 25 January 2012

This is a page for hosting consensus items currently under debate, with their formal wording.

The Consensus Items History is the public record of consensus items that have been decided on in the past. Please move the records from the "Current" page to the "History" page once they've been approved/blocked.

Date First Discussed Proposed By Wording Author of this Record
2012-01-03 Tom That the conditions under which Noisebridge membership expires be expressed more clearly and simply. (3 of 4 items related to this passed; one is still pending) Danny
Personal tools