Category talk:Events: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(removing lameness.)
(rmvin eql lamness)
Line 130: Line 130:


All in all, EVERYONE benefits by directing inexperienced coders to learn JS and other FWD techniques from the [[Front-end Web Development]] class and directing more experienced web developers and programmers of other languages to the [[JavaScript]] class.
All in all, EVERYONE benefits by directing inexperienced coders to learn JS and other FWD techniques from the [[Front-end Web Development]] class and directing more experienced web developers and programmers of other languages to the [[JavaScript]] class.
== [[User:Nthmost|Nthmost]] electing '''Nuclear option''' ==
11:47, 16 May 2014‎ [[User:Nthmost|Nthmost]] ([[User talk:Nthmost|Talk]] | contribs)‎ m . . (0)‎ . . (Protected "Category:Events": Excessive vandalism (‎[edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) ‎[move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)))
Okay, what's done is done.<br>
Still, in the Category:Events Party for Saturday May 17 2014 21:00, an awesomely '''excellent''' edit could be:<br>
|description  = In town to get your MAKE on, come by Saturday after [http://makerfaire.com/ Maker Faire] and get your HACK on at Noisebridge!<br><br>
... or [[User:Nthmost|Nthmost]] and the other powers-that-be can just keep ignoring suggestions like these.<br>
Whatever......<br>
'''Dearly misguided,'''
It would be easier to take suggestions if they actually, you know, came to our attention in some way.  I'm not going to keep watching these Talk pages.  The only reason I'm even here is that someone noticed a bunch of anonymous trollish edits coming from a particular IP address and sent me a link.
Options at your disposal:
* the nb-discuss list
* Slack
* emailing someone personally
* the rack list
The "nuclear option" is temporary and only applies to a few pages.  Feel free to troll elsewhere -- somewhere that doesn't matter as much to the continued well-being of the community. 
It's of benefit to no-one to erase or make malicious subtle edits to event listings.  Go do something productive for a change.
--[[User:Nthmost|Nthmost]] ([[User talk:Nthmost|talk]]) 22:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:28, 17 May 2014

it'd be nice if everybody would tag 'events' with [[category:events]]

gba 00:22, 15 October 2008 (PDT)



Looking for help to set up an event: OOTSIDEBOX project presentation at NOISEBRIDGE

Hi There,

I'm Jean Noël and I'm looking for help to finalize the organization of this event on Sat november 23th: https://noisebridge.net/wiki/Www.OOTSIDEBOX.com_making_NOISE_in_California

I plan to have up to 20 particpants, 10 guys already confirmed that they will come. To find out more about OOTSIDEBOX project:

http://www.ootsidebox.com http://ootsidebox.blogspot.fr/2013/10/7-key-concepts-underlaying-design-of.html http://www.youtube.com/user/MrTROLLEEN

Waiting for reply...

Best Regards Jean Noel jnl.ootsidebox@gmail.com

FWD Events Re-Direction

There is no reason to mention that I post my events to noisebridge-discuss and noisebridge-announce, "invariably" or not.

No one benefits from that information on the event listing - I'm trying to keep my description lean. JeffreyATW (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

-- (saved separately in case of future undo's)

Thanks for using this Category_talk:Events section.
But no, a certain percentage of people invariably see the fairly brief wiki event description here before viewing the listserve posting (assuming they're subscribed to either listserve). They'll subsequently be able to use the Discuss/Announce re-direction in its current state to effectively see timely reminders of the bi-weekly FWD highlights.
As a beneficial use-case scenario for those of us (who shall remain nameless) solely wishing to glean highlights of bi-weekly FWD events, this very re-direction filters out the large amount of discussion "noise" even better than subscribing to the Discuss list in Daily Digest mode.

Let's please keep it that way.


JavaScript Edits

The simple idea here is that beginning programmers are more likely to pick up JS material through the more elementary Front-end Web Development material than they necessarily would be from the EcmaScript programming language, DOM, Object Oriented JavaScript, and Events covered in THIS particular advanced JavaScript class. The FWD instructor, JeffreyATW, even routinely provides live video streams of the class for the convenience of his students (see [1]).

All in all, EVERYONE benefits by directing inexperienced coders to learn JS and other FWD techniques from the Front-end Web Development class and directing more experienced web developers and programmers of other languages to the JavaScript class.

Nthmost electing Nuclear option

11:47, 16 May 2014‎ Nthmost (Talk | contribs)‎ m . . (0)‎ . . (Protected "Category:Events": Excessive vandalism (‎[edit=autoconfirmed] (indefinite) ‎[move=autoconfirmed] (indefinite)))

Okay, what's done is done.
Still, in the Category:Events Party for Saturday May 17 2014 21:00, an awesomely excellent edit could be:
|description = In town to get your MAKE on, come by Saturday after Maker Faire and get your HACK on at Noisebridge!

... or Nthmost and the other powers-that-be can just keep ignoring suggestions like these.
Whatever......


Dearly misguided,

It would be easier to take suggestions if they actually, you know, came to our attention in some way. I'm not going to keep watching these Talk pages. The only reason I'm even here is that someone noticed a bunch of anonymous trollish edits coming from a particular IP address and sent me a link.


Options at your disposal:

  • the nb-discuss list
  • Slack
  • emailing someone personally
  • the rack list

The "nuclear option" is temporary and only applies to a few pages. Feel free to troll elsewhere -- somewhere that doesn't matter as much to the continued well-being of the community.

It's of benefit to no-one to erase or make malicious subtle edits to event listings. Go do something productive for a change.

--Nthmost (talk) 22:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)