Attacking FDE hardware solutions: Difference between revisions

From Noisebridge
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added citations from seagate web page and hgst whitepaper, and links to hitachi entries in nist aes validation list)
Line 21: Line 21:
* IEEE
* IEEE
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_P1619
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_P1619
** [http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1619/email/msg01842.html Letter of Assurance from IBM re P1619.1/D17]


* Seagate
* Seagate

Revision as of 21:36, 18 January 2009

Many companies tout hard drives with built in encryption as the solution to the Cold Boot Attack. Additionally, these drives are sold as a major step forward in overall data security. In theory, this sounds like a good idea; in practice this could go horribly wrong.

This project is currently in a research state to find different drives that claim to offer specific security properties. It is expected that many products will fail even the most cursory look.

Please add links to products, vendors, standards, prices and places to purchase hardware. At some point, we'll start acquiring hardware to do specific implementation analysis.

Drive manufacturers and specific drive models

Previously published research

Standards and Whitepapers relating to FDE at the hardware level

Other related documents

List of FDE (SW & HW) providers

Terminology